Meredith Griffin | Meredith Griffin

Narrow Way Leadership

I recently read a blog post at The Practice of Leadership that set my mind thinking. The post, Leadership is About Blazing New Trails, was actually in line with the sermon that I preached on Sunday and where my mind has been for several quarters at least.

Let me begin with the requisite disclaimer. I believe that many churches within the contemporary Western expressions of Christianity are genuinely seeking to know and do the will of Jesus Christ. The evidence can be seen in many of the programs that are reaching into and transforming communities and individual lives. Many Christian leaders truly believe that they are hearing and obeying the voice of God, with many seeking that voice in the venues offered at the plethora of conference offerings.

With that said, I believe that there are an equal number of blindly groping copycats within contemporary Western Christianity. Those who believe that the will of God for their leadership context is to follow the leader, and do whatever seems to be working down the street. These leaders aimlessly wander from conference to conference, bookstore to bookstore, in an attempt to catch the next “wave” to successful ministry. The saddest indictment of this seemingly never ending trend is the long trail of sincere men and women who believe they are following God’s “anointed” man or woman.

You might ask, “what does this have to do with anything” or “how can you be so sure that they aren’t doing exactly what they are supposed to be doing”? I’m so glad that you asked. It should be clear to the discerning Christian that our call in Scripture was always designed to be one that didn’t gain wide acceptance. We are called to walk through the narrow gate by Jesus in Matthew 7:13-14. Peter says that we are a “peculiar” people in 1 Peter 2:9. It was God’s intention that we be a people set apart from the world we are called to influence. This doesn’t mean that we are an elitist, separatist, xenophobic group who believes that unity and uniformity are synonyms. Neither does it mean that we are a people who tolerate sin, and skewed interpretations of Scripture for the purpose of inclusion. It means that we are people who are called to be the unique possession of God himself.

Here is the rub. Much of what is passed off as Christian leadership (and as a result, Christian ministry), is neither unique or possessed of God. In many areas it is, in fact, compromising, without spark, and a retread of some well-worn idea from a self-proclaimed guru. If it is nothing else, Christian ministry is meant to be incarnational. Christian leaders, ministries, and those within them are supposed to be the manifest expression of Jesus Christ in whatever context they find themselves in. Paul says in 1 Corinthians 9:19-23,

For though I am free from all, I have made myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them. To the Jews, I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews. To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law. To the weak I became weak, that I might win the weak. I have become all things to all people, that by all means I might save some. I do it all for the sake of the gospel, that I share with them in its blessings.

Paul knew that in order to reach the very ones that Christ died for, he would be required to step outside of the box. He would have to become an exegete of the culture he was seeking to reach, and translate the gospel into a language they could understand. All of this was to be accomplished without “dumbing down” the message, accepting sinfulness as normal, or in any other way compromising the name of Christ. All of these elements are essential for narrow way leadership. We must make the gospel message relevant without compromising its truths. We must confront injustice and sin, without becoming legalists. We must be cutting edge in our approaches to outreach and evangelism, without embracing heresy or indulging “itching ears.”

I lament the fact that there are few narrow way leaders in contemporary Western Christianity. I also lament the fact that those who are narrow way leaders, are either marginalized, persecuted, or eventually themselves become the stale establishement that they were sent to replace.

Servanthood Should Be At Our Core

Leadership

I formerly belonged to a church that transitioned from a denominational expression to a non-denominational one. In this transition, the church embraced the tenets of the neo-pentecostal, charismatic, and apostolic movements. One of the hallmarks of the neo-pentecostal movements is an embracing of a new type of episcopal structure. This church, along with about six others, founded an episcopal organization and elected one of the pastors the bishop. While, hierarchical in nature, as are most episcopal structures, it was supposed to be a “relational” episcopacy. This episcopal structure was to be driven by the relationships among the leaders, and not by the positions or ranks that they held.

While the movement has many of the flaws that are inherent in a charisma-driven, hierarchically-structured, blind loyalty-demanding system, there was one very visual aspect that espouses what it means to be a servant at the core. This post is not meant to be a statement regarding my support or disdain for neo-pentecostalism or the proliferation of “reformations” and “apostolic networks, but simply a testimony of the symbolic nature inherent in some of the trappings and their underlying meaning for servant leadership.

At the inception of the group, I was able to witness and participate in the consecration of a bishop. The service was filled with pageantry and symbolism. The spirit of God filled the sanctuary, and emotions were overflowing. But underneath all of the outward pageantry, liturgy, and anthems was a prominent yet inconspicuous fact–the new Bishop, even in his dress, proclaimed his role as servant.

While studying the episcopacy in preparation for this auspicious event, I studied the various garments that bishops adorn themselves with. During the consecration service the new bishop was vested in these garments, layer after layer. I can only imagine that the many layers of garments were both heavy and hot. This fact alone can be seen as a metaphor for the weight and pressure inherent in the office to which a bishop, as chief servant, is called.

The bishop is first dressed in a cassock. The cassock is a simple, straight, unadorned garment that symbolizes the servanthood of the one wearing it. The next garment worn is the cincture. The cincture is a cummerbund type belt that girds the waist of the wearer, and symbolizes the humility of the wearer. It is fashioned after the towel that Jesus girded himself with as he washed the disciples’ feet. The rochet symbolizes the wearer’s role as priest, and is fashioned after the ephod worn by Aaron and his sons. The chimere is worn over the rochet, and symbolizes the prophetic role of the wearer, proclaiming his/her role as Chief Preacher and Defender of the Faith. The zucchetto is placed upon the bishop’s head. This skull cap is symbolic of prayer and submission.

The celebration garments that adorn the bishop are worn at various times, and include the cope (a cloak-like garment), the chasuble (worn during the celebration of the Lord’s Supper), the mitre (a head covering that embodies symbols of the cloven tongues of fire and the Holy Spirit), the crosier (Shepherd’s staff), and the bishop’s ring (symbolizing episcopal collegiality).

It is clear that there are many garments that are worn simultaneously (although not all listed above are worn at the same time), but it is the order of the garments that bears a closer look. The garments themselves symbolize many things; priesthood, prophet, defender of the faith, chief preacher, prayer, episcopal collegiality, worship, etc. But the first garment adorned, the cassock, is the most important. This foundational garment speaks volumes to the role that the bishop, and by extension all Christians, are called to fulfill.

Undergirding every other role that the bishop is called to play, is a servant. The cassock represents this well; a simple garment without gold or silver buttons or adornment. A close fitting garment that, along with its cincture, reminds the wearer that he/she is not to be exalted. It reminds them of the life of Jesus Christ, who though he was God, did not perceive this fact as something to be grasped. Christ took upon himself willingly the form of a servant. That is the call for all who would seek higher service in the Lord–it is a call to servanthood in greater degrees. While the other garments sport ruffled or adorned cuffs, gold clasps, or are made from ornate fabrics, under all of these are the garments of a simple servant.

The message is simple. It doesn’t matter what position in ministry you hold. Whether bishop, priest, pastor, brother, deacon, usher, choir member, janitor, or cook, we are all called to be servants at the core. God doesn’t care how we dress ourselves outwardly, he merely cares what exists underneath of it all. Are you a servant at your core? Do you exist for the outward trappings that others will see? Is your motivation to climb the ladder of church hierarchy? If so, then look at the top and take your cue from there. Christ, at his core was a servant. Christ said “whoever wants to be a leader among you must be your servant.”

Servant-Leadership Defined

Leadership

In the inaugural post for this blog I discussed the fact that our current notion of leadership is in need of transformation. The leadership paradigm that I believe is best able to position leaders in both the sacred and secular arenas for long-term efficiency and mission success is servant-leadership. There are many varied definitions of servant-leadership being espoused in the world today, with all of them have similar characteristics and origins. Allow me to define what I mean when using the term, servant-leadership. This definition has been refined (and may be refined even more) through reading other definitions, and personal experience.

I define a servant-leader as one who, by intentionally serving and sacrificing for the needs of others, is able to influence them toward common goals.

The Flow of Service

Leadership, Rants

just as the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.

I recently had a conversation with a denominational leader who spoke words that articulated his heart as a servant leader. He said, “service doesn’t flow to me, service flows from me.” He, as a leader of over 70 churches and nearly 10,000 Christians, viewed himself as the servant of the local church. He believed that if military terminology were used, and he were a general (a district leader within a denomination), then his responsibility would be to ensure that the men and women at the front lines (the local church) were more than adequately equipped to fulfill their mission. “My role exists”, he said, “so that men like you can acheive the goal of Christ.”

The words of Christ, quoted at the beginning of this post are profound. So too, are the words of the quoted denominational leader. Unfortunatley, these words seem to have fallen upon deaf ears among the current crop of church leaders. Glancing at the charismatic leaders of this generations model churches give one the distinct impression that service is to be rendered to the leaders, rather than by the leaders. Many of today’s leaders believe that a sign of their success is the number of persons who are “called” to serve as their personal adjutants or armorbearers; many of these well meaning men and women being taught a perverted meaning of these ministries of service.

Let me cut to the point. It is not designed by God that service flow to church leaders, but that it flow from them to those they lead. This is the essence of servant leadership. I know that some reading this will immediately desire to quote every known verse in Scripture that you believe justifies the extravagance, and over the top lifestyles of many leaders today. Let me say, without being harsh, save it! For every verse that you quote, I will give one that demonstrates the leader’s call to give their life for others. I don’t begrudge anyone the opportunity to provide food, clothing, and shelter for their family. However, being sober adults, we must realize that much of what is being done in Christendom today is at best selfish.

Excuse the rant, but I have grow weary of men who have not resisted to the point of shedding blood in their striving against sin continually lifting up their “inheritance and kingly anointing.” We, the Church, have allowed the name of Christ to be hijacked by those who are in it to make a name for themselves and find fortune. These twenty-first century soothsayers promise much and deliver little, while making sure that their ‘cover charge’ is paid in advance. Enough ranting, back to the point. Christ makes a clear case for what the life of a servant leaders is to be.

A leader is not called in order to be served

Our call and station as leaders, while a high calling, is not one that gives us an exalted position over others. In Matthew 20:25, Jesus makes this point clear. The secular leaders in His day practiced this type of leadership, a leadership where they lorded their position over others. Christ plainly told the disciples that it was not to be that way among us.

A Christian leader is called to serve others

We are called to be servants. This means that our primary duty as leaders is to do what other persons need done to aid, benefit, or assist them. Seeing ourselves, while fulfilling these duties, as living a life like our Savior should bring us great joy.

Too many leaders see this model of leadership as being weak, soft, or allowing oneself to be taken advantage of. Nothing could be further from the truth. If you have ever been in a restaurant, a good waitperson can be an excellent illustration of a servant. This person looks forward to, takes pride in, and strives to do whatever is asked of them by the person being served. They will take your order, make sure the order is filled, exchange the order if incorrect, and generally see to it that your dining experience is an enjoyable one. In their eyes they cannot be taken advantage of because they have chosen to serve. This means that whatever they are asked to do, is what they are there for in the first place. So it is with the leader serving in the mold of Christ. If God has called me to lead as a servant, then whatever I am called to do is what I will do. This remains true because I remember that service flows from me, and not to me.

A Christian leader’s life is meant to be given

The servant leader finds joy in giving of themself, because that is their purpose. The servant leader who doesn’t give their life in service to others feels like a dinner plate that is used like a chair; out of place. As a servant leader you are fulfilled in giving yourself to other people. Christ knew that even above the miracles, teachings, and fulfilling of the Law there was the purpose for which He came; to give His life. If He had only healed the sick, raised the dead, taught the ignorant, and fed the hungry, then He would have been incomplete. A servant must give themeselves.

In sowing their life a Christian leader blessed many

Jesus said, in John 12:24, “…unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit.” When we willing sow our lives unselfishly into the lives of the people we are called to lead, then we bear much fruit. Believe me when I say that this is much more than the fruit that is borne when we reverse the flow of service.

Bottom line

My beginning rant aside, we need to drastically revise our view of leadership in the Western church. We need to stop following the “flavor of the month” prophet/apostle/bishop who has a “fresh word” that is guaranteed to bless our lives, and go back to following Jesus. We need to remember the admonitions of Christ in Matthew 23. In this text He rebukes the double-standard laden living of the Pharisees and scribes. He says that these men lay heavy burdens upon men, burdens that they are unwilling to lift themselves. They say things (for others to do), but do not do them themselves. They love the best seats and the exalted titles, but ultimatley the one who will be exalted will be the servant. Stay blessed.

Servant Leadership Is All About Relationships

Leadership

It really doesn’t matter what area of life we are discussing; be it secular employment, child rearing, or church leadership, it all comes down to relationships. We are only as effective as the depth of the relationships that we establish with other people. As go our various relationships, so goes the surrounding structure. If this is the case, and I believe that it is, then we would be well served to do whatever is necessary to improve our relationship skills. If we are going to fulfill our mission as Christian leaders, and live out the legcy of our calling, then there are a couple of relationship points that bear remembering.

First, we do not, nor can we, exist in isolation. As much as we may earnestly desire the opposite to be true from time to time, it is impossible for any person to reach their full potential by themselves. Naturally flowing from this thought also is the point that the Church cannot fulfill her mission if we isolate ourselves as Christians. We need one another in order to fulfill our potential. If we are talking about marriage or certain sports the principle seems obvious, but in leadership we tend to believe that we can make it alone. The maverick, lone ranger, my way or the highway styles of leadership seem to be the ones that grab our attention the most. As much as we may admire the leaders who appear able to function all by themselves and make things happen, we need to understand that these styles of leadership run contratry to what is modeled for us in Scripture.

Paul, would lead us to understand that we are all connected, members of one another. And as such, if one person falters we all are harmed. This means that even the leader, is only as effective as those men and women being led. In order for me to achieve, I must ensure that each individual member is achieving. My individual success depends upon our collective success as individuals. What does this mean for me as a leader? What kind of leader does this turn me into? What, given these facts, must I become in order to succeed? A servant!

Wow! What a novel idea. But, I recognize that many of you may be perplexed by the notion that one person can be both a servant and a leader simultaneously. You may ask, how can I remain secure in my position as leader, if I become the servant of those that I am called to lead? Well, it is actually not that difficult a prospect, particular if we recount the life of Jesus Christ himself. Jesus said, in Matthew 20:25-28,

…You know that the rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great men exercise authority over them. It is not this way among you, but whoever wishes to become great among you shall be your servant, and whoever wishes to be first among you shall be your slave, just as the Son of man came not to be served, but to serve, and to give His life as a ransom for many.

In the words of Jesus, a true leader is a servant first. We must make every effort to see ourselves first as ones called to serve the needs of the persons we lead; caretakers of a sort. This is a far cry from the Western notion of leadership, and particularly leadership in the neo-pentecostal, apostolic, and charismatic movements, where those we lead are seen as caretakers of our needs. But if we seriously consider the role of a caretaker, he or she would typically be the one in leadership, mainly due to their access and proximity to the knowledge and resources needed for the good of the group. This caretaker is not the owner of the resources, nor the keeper of the knowledge, but simply the one entrusted to ensure that everyone prospers (given the current culture I was slow to use that word) and has access to all that is available. The caretaker is the owner’s steward. It is not our special knowledge or private stash of goods. We serve the needs of the owner, by ensuring that everyone is served. In so doing, the caretaker ensures that the owner is pleased. The caretaker is a servant leader. The question is, do we see ourselves as caretakers?

So what does this have to with relationships? Well, everything. If we are called to lead, then we are called to be in relationship with and serve other people. We must see ourselves as persons seeking the ascent of other people. We exist to see other achieve. This kind of view is demanded by our interconnectedness as Christians, and our calling as leaders. Until we can see the values, mission, vision, purpose, and goals of another person as vitally important to the fulfillment of our own, then we shall continue to fall short of fulfilling our legacy as Christian leaders.